We've talked quite a bit about Lorrie Moore's
use of the second person to narrate most of her stories. Recently we touched on
the fact that there seems to be different types of the second person that she
uses in different stories, I just wanted to elaborate on the wide variety of
"flavors" of the second person that we get in Self-Help.
The first of these, in "How to be an Other
Woman," is a mix of imperative commands that narrate the plot and
descriptive sections that tell you what you are doing and help build the
setting. For example the first line of the story is one of these imperative
commands: "Meet in expensive beige raincoats, on a pea-soupy night."
and later, "First stand in front of Florsheim's...Draw a peace
sign..." (3). But the whole story isn't just commands. Later in the first
section we are exposed to the more descriptive, "setting the scene"
flavor of Moore's second person: "You are waiting for a bus...You climb on
together, grab adjacent chrome posts, and when the bus hisses and rumbles
forward, you take out a book" (3). This "flavor" is the basic
foundation for the other varieties that Moore uses.
The next flavor of the second person, in
"How," is similar to that of "How to be an Other Woman"
with one major difference: the addition of uncertainty. "How’s” narrative
voice presents the reader with a number of alternatives of how a situation
could have come to be. For example, "Begin by meeting him in a class, in a
bar, at a rummage sale. Maybe he teaches sixth grade. Manages a hardware store.
Foreman at a carton factory" (55). One important thing about this flavor
is that even if it seems like there is some choice or variability in how the
situations described in "How" came to be, the outcome is always the
same.
The last example of a new variation is seen in
"How to Talk to Your Mother (Notes)." This story is written almost
entirely in the "imperative command" style. Short commanding phrases
that are telling you to "do this" or "say that." There are
examples of this throughout the story. "Learn to repeat things.... Make
apple crisp for the first time" (89). "Eat Chinese food for the first
time with a lawyer from California...Attack his profession. Ask him whether he
feels..." (91). This flavor creates a more choppy, "scene by
scene" kind of effect that works well in this story since "How to
Talk to Your Mother (Notes)" is written as a timeline of short events.
Of course there are probably other examples of
many other subtle "flavors" of Lorrie Moore's second person but these
were the ones that stuck out to me. Each flavor is unique, but not necessarily
better or worse than the others, they each work well with their respective
stories. Overall I was mostly surprised how Lorrie Moore was able to create so
many different "flavors," especially considering that the second
person is a narrative voice that isn't used very often at all.
I can't tell if the text on your is actually supposed to be black or it's a problem with me, but if it is, it's difficult to read. It is interesting reading through the different "flavors" of second person, and the second version seems to smell of the fun "pick your own adventure" types of books Elissa mentioned. On the other hand, I didn't really feel that those options were developed, which. along with deviating from that first comparison, took away from the experience a bit for me.
ReplyDeleteI really used the use of 2nd person in this book. Great job at describing the "flavors." One thing I was thinking while I was reading this was that maybe we shouldn't be so surprised there are different ways to write in 2nd person. We all know there are thousands of ways to make 3rd person unique. Maybe we are just so intrigued by this because we very rarely see 2nd person in writing.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the different "flavors" you mentioned. I saw these different approaches to the second person as a sort of spectrum: on one end, you have the very vague, almost choose-your-own-adventure approach of "How," while on the other end, you have "How to talk to Your Mother (Notes)," where your whole life is more or less dictated to you. These all had one thing in common though: no matter how open-ended they seemed, Moore made sure that there was a set ending. The endings are never really open-ended. Even in "How," when many aspects of the story are extremely vague, the ending happens no matter what.
ReplyDelete