As we
read and discussed "Teddy" in class on Friday, and talked about how
unexpected it was that Teddy was so intelligent and outspoken and spiritually
knowledgeable, I thought back to the other children that we see in Salinger's
stories and realized that there is more to them than meets the eye as well.
They all seem more perceptive than the average child and seem to get
progressively more observant and knowledgeable the deeper we get into Nine
Stories. We discussed a bit in class how there seem to be a lot of children in
Salinger's stories and going back through we find that more than half of his
stories have main characters or important that are children.
From the
very first story, Salinger presents us with an important child character in
Sybil. While she may seem like a regular four year old that likes playing in
the ocean and searching for fun, made-up creatures such as the bananafish, she
is also much more perceptive than one might think. She picks up on small
details that the average four-year old wouldn't think to notice, such as how
Seymour allowed Sharon Lipschutz to sit with him on the piano bench.
The next
child we meet, Ramona in Uncle Wiggily in Connecticut, who's seemingly normal
child behavior (having an imaginary boyfriend) becomes more than that when we
find out that her "beau" died and she replaced him with another
friend. This quick replacement seems very similar to her mother's own replacement
of Walt (after he dies) with her new husband Lew.
Another
good example of this can be found in the story Down at the Dinghy, where we
learn that Lionel (the young boy in the story) has run away again. At first
this is presented as fairly commonplace especially for this kid, but as we move
deeper into the story we learn that he overheard the maids insulting his father
when they thought he wasn't listening. This again shows how the children in
Salinger are much more perceptive than they seem to be when we first meet them
in each story.
As we
progress through the collection we meet Esme, in For Esme:-- with Love and
Squalor, who is overall a very intelligent and discerning girl, especially
being only about thirteen. She immediately picks up on the fact that the
narrator is an American soldier who is being trained on the secret base in
preparation for the D-Day assault, and without reservation approaches him and
asks him about it. As their conversation moves on, she is presented more and
more as a very bright, if a little blunt, young girl. This is further confirmed
with her offer to write him letters and her request that he write a story about
her.
The image
of astute/smart children that are more than meets the eye that Salinger
presents us with is culminated in the final story of the collection: Teddy.
As I said earlier Teddy is extremely intelligent and spiritually aware, despite
being ten years old. In fact he is on his way back from the UK where he was
being interviewed about his belief that he is the reincarnated spirit of an
Indian holy man. As the story progresses he engages in a debate with a man
aboard the ship, Bob Nicholson, where he dictates his ideas on how people
should be taught and even goes so far as to predict his own death and its
repercussions.
Throughout
Salinger's Nine Stories we, as readers, are presented with a very interesting
view of children. They appear in more than half of the stories as important
(and sometimes main) characters and they are always shown to be more intelligent
or perceptive than the average child their age or than how they first appear.
This dynamic allows for Salinger to move the plot along in a new way, making
the readers choose if they are willing to believe the ideas/thoughts of a young
child or not. Overall I found this very refreshing, especially since Salinger
has shown himself to be very good at writing the dialogue and interactions
between adults and children.
I think that it is interesting how, as you said, Salinger uses children as such an important part of the plots. I think this might be because people so often say that children see things very differently from adults and often have wiser things to say. Teddy acknowledges this in some way as he talks about how children think with less logic than adults, and how this is good. Salinger may have been trying to exaggerate this with his characters being these extraordinary children with very good insight. Though he may make them seem less credible, they may also seem wiser.
ReplyDeleteI think that perhaps the reason Salinger writes about so many astute/gifted children is because he himself may have been one. His child characters feel very compelling and I think that this could be because of Salinger's personal experience. I'm not sure there is really any evidence to back this idea, but I thought it was worth bringing up.
ReplyDeleteInteresting idea... It's entirely possible that his experiences as a child could have shaped the way he portrayed children in this collection. Such a nuanced depiction of these kids that was met, at least when I was reading, with many "haha I know someone like that" or "wait that's so accurate" thoughts, seems difficult to have engineered without a personal experience of some sorts. As for the post itself, my comment on Elissa's blog can essentially be copied and pasted here. Salinger's portrayal of these kids clearly shows how surprisingly developed their brains and ideas are, even at such a young age. Parents and other adults may ignore their astute observations, but maybe they're more worth listening to than most would like to admit.
Delete